The New Protestants

Adapted from an article written by Rob at Mindweapons in Ragnarok

There is a saying from the military, “The strongest swords are forged in the hottest flames.” The Multicult Hell of Unreason is such a Forge of Mindweapons.

The rising generation of White kids are given a stark choice; surrender and be a whigger/mudshark, or defiantly be true to yourself, true to what you really are. That is the tragedy of whiggers and mudsharks — they lose their true selves. They fail their own destiny. But those who make the opposite choice are forced to overcome resistance in order to simply be who they are.

The Multicult Hell of Unreason, besides being dangerous yet also laughable, happens to be the state religion, as surely as Catholicism reigned over Europe in 1100. Those of us who go against it are analogous to the early Protestants. And what distinguished the founding Protestants such as Luther, Calvin and Zwingli was a great seriousness, the spread of literacy, and the “Protestant work ethic” we all know so much about.

The Puritans were the Protestants who kept going more and more hard core, more “purist,” the Far Right of the 16th and 17th century. In the 1600’s, the Puritans founded a country (Mayflower, 1620), AND committed regicide.

Here is a picture of Oliver Cromwell, one of the most hardcore fascists who ever lived:

Look at the eyes. Behold the face of White Jihad. The Mindweapon is the marriage of Reason and Fanaticism. Yes, they go to together, like man and woman, like Yin and Yang.

Oliver Cromwell and the Puritans and the Roundheads took the Disingenuous White Liberals of his time and crushed them underfoot, and took an ax and chopped off the head of King Charles I. They weren’t fucking around. This is what a serious revolutionary movement looks like.

[edit: this is a good place to insert Bowden’s recalling of Cromwell]

Cromwell once had a phrase: “I disembowel you for Christ’s love.” And that’s what he said in the Putney Debates. When the parliamentary side won the Civil War, the whole New Model Army, which of course was a revolutionary army of that time—no brothels, no drinking; in the Royal army, you went to the back, and there was endless entertainment at the back of the battlefront. With the Puritan armies, there was none of that. You went to the back, and there was no drinking, and there was a chap ranting at you about whether you’d sinned that day.

17th Century Gott mit uns

It was less fun, but at the same time, when they raised their pikes together, not in a higgledy-piggledy way, or one bloke at the back didn’t want to, but they raised them together, as one unit. They would all chant, “God is our strength.” Cromwell understood as Shaw said early in the 20th century that a man who has a concept of reality that is metaphysically objectivist, a man who believes in something as absolute truth is worth fifty men. And that’s the type of revolutionary ideology that these people then had.

But it has to be grounded in a deep religious fanaticism. This is what made them so culturally strong — they were financially independent, ready to go somewhere and settle a new place, and then fight for their place in the sun against the Indians and then against the British. It wasn’t just fighting with cannon and muskets; it was also a war of commerce.

The Protestants and Puritans were people of wealth, and used their wealth, their fanaticism, and their “Protestant work ethic” as a weapon of war, particularly against the British. Their hate for British royal rule was very powerful. In the 1700’s, Puritanism expressed itself as the War of Independence, and then faded away and turned into abolitionist churches, and now fake fag churches flying rainbow flags. Such is the degeneration of history.

And now we are the new Protestants. And the state church that has a boot on our neck is the Multicult Hell of Unreason, administered by a priesthood of Disingenuous White Liberals (et al).

The Strongest Swords are Forged in the Hottest Flames.

5 thoughts on “The New Protestants

  1. Started off as a good article then got silly with the shilling for the cancer that was Cromwell, the mercenary who brought the heebs back into England after they’d been expelled for centuries. Protestantism degenerating into abolitionism and LGBT wokeness is a feature, not a bug. Protestantism is Sunni Christianity. We can do better.

  2. Good to see the article reposted!

    I wrote that post years ago. At this point I believe it’s useful to tell Jews directly that Jews v White nationalists is analogous to Catholics v Protestants. It’s going to be a prolonged religious conflict. That’s precisely what Jews don’t want! They don’t want us knowing that we are in a religious conflict, and they definitely don’t want us fighting back. So putting Jews on notice that the goyim know and we are fighting White Genocide is already causing internal strife within the Jewish community. There’s a significant number of them who don’t believe Multiculturalism is worth a prolonged intense religious conflict with the likes of us.

  3. While I like the idea of a spiritual revolt, I do not think we should model ourselves after protestants, nor be calling Cromwell a hardcore fascist. If anything he was a Proto-Bolshevik. We should definitely have a strong merchant caste, but merchants shouldn’t be the spearheaders of our cause, as is the case with the Protestants then and the Jews always.

  4. The article has a deeper understanding of fascism than “Cromwell let the heebs in”. These manifestations of white intolerance and fanaticism take different forms but we always manifest them in response to oppression. The Puritans were collectivist and hardcore. The merchants were not the spearhead of their cause, the preachers were. To get the king off their ass they brought in jew money. Big jew mistake, their little 52 person colony resulted in 197 million new white people on the earth.

    The puritans relocated for their cause and for greater freedom. How many WN will do that, out of 197M people? 10-50?
    They attacked their enemies physically. How many WN will do that? 1 or 2? They pooled money for their projects. How many WN will do that? 0?
    I wish we had a movement .0001% as strong as the Puritans.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *