In the United States the racial policy will have world political effects, in exactly the same way as once the idea of Democracy determined the life of almost all states. North America is the area in which freemasonic Human Rights were first realized. Brother Washington became the archetype of this philosophy. The American declaration of freedom was the model for the Droits de l’homme of the Paris revolution. Admittedly in order to further capitalism, the battle cry of Rights of Man was heard, and the liberation of the Blacks was accomplished in the southern states.

Today every single American curses this Black liberation. The American liberal is bound and determined to force his ideas on America, for as a state, the antiquated Liberalism thumps the dub of Freedom on all citizens even if it must be beaten in with rubber truncheons. The Black question stands at the head of all questions of existence in the United States of America. If the insane principle of the equality and equal rights of all races and religions is one day finally given up, there is yet hope.

The salvation from the abyss, however, lies in exactly the opposite direction than, for example, Spengler sees. It is not the captains of industry and the Caesars who rule over personalityless masses who must affirm destiny. We recognize that this future is already half past. Everywhere powers are born which, out of the decline of the old, already shape a new picture of the world. These forces are not reversible. These powers of our soul and of our blood are our destiny. This is the striving for world discovery in the 15th and 16th centuries, and after human culture and the world state in the 18th and 19th centuries.

The United States of America, according to the universal agreement of all travelers, is the magnificent land of the future. It has the great task of throwing aside all outworn ideas which date from before its foundation. It can proceed with youthful strength to set up the new idea of the racial state, such as some awakened Americans have already apprehended, like Grant and Stoddard. They saw the necessity for the expulsion and resettlement of the Blacks and the Yellow men, the handing over of east Asiatic possessions to Japan, the working toward a Black colonization in central Africa, and the resettlement of the Jews to a region where this entire group can find a place.

The attempts of imperialist powers in the last decades to rule the furthermost corners of the world with cannons and to keep the exploited peoples in order were not signs of strength but a proof of weakness, in the same way that a disproportionately large police force in a state does not show a strong structure, but rottenness instead. Europe and America entered east Asia on the pretext that they had to preserve their trade in China, thereby saving hundreds of thousands, indeed millions, of jobs at home from collapse. That view is untenable; the only valid conclusion is that they did this with contemporary imperialism’s lust for robbery. Such a greatly populated land as China is dependent on the export of its products. No American warships are necessary in order to load tea and spices and to exchange European wares for these products. China signifies, for centuries ahead, a giant market for the chemical and technical products of the west.

The idea of a racially based world policy signifies in relation to east Asia its independence. It also suggests the release of other nations from the present system which controls them. These states have been for a long time four fifths under Jewish control. This new idea of the Nordic west confronts Judaism as the sole dangerous opponent of a faceless Pan Europe, chaotic world justice, and the folkish less freemasonic world republic. No other idea has any validity.

The honorless rule of money must, by necessity, strive for world rule by creating world debt. A racially organic demarcation on the earth, however, signifies, by necessity, the end of international gold currency. This would result in the end of a Jewish messianism that has nearly been realized through the rule of the world banks. It intends to perfect its ideas in the creation of a Jewish center in Jerusalem…The era of boundless expansion has ended with a world war and with the world rule of money. Today we begin the era of inner concentration which will produce a racially organically sectioned state system. To grasp these ideas consciously, and to work for their carrying through, all philosophers, historians and statesmen of all peoples are called upon today. The folkish idea is falsified today by the international capitalists. In that struggle between the states, every measure, indeed every idea, which can have a settling effect is suppressed.

Contemporary pacifism is revealed as a completely untruthful movement. In fact, pacifism rests on democracy, that is, in practice, on the rule of money. Its prattling about world disarmament is a swindle designed to divert the people from the actual causes of their pustulent wounds. World peace will not come with the disarmament of armies and fleets, but with the complete destruction of dishonorable democracy and faceless ideas of the state. Peace will come when we can change the world economic system which is today undermined by finance in the name of the people. These things have brought about the decline of all states. This decline will continue if the religion of the blood is not vitally experienced, recognized, and realized in life.

-excerpted from “Myth of the 20th Century” By Alfred Rosenberg (1931)

4 thoughts on “Rosenberg On America’s Future

  1. I hated reading this book for its lack of structure. One of the worst popular books of that era.

    Too bad there aren’t any decent American philosophers today. At least I don’t know any worth anyone’s time.

    America’s future, as in ‘White Man’s future in America’, is a fascinating subject. Personally I think some sort of ‘rebirth’ is required, not only politically, but also spiritually.

    Perhaps a break-up into smaller, independet states is required for the European spirit to actually, finally take root (again?) on that continent. After so much time of garbage abstractions.

    Perhaps the sheer scale of this ‘nation’ prevented an organic expression of identity in the first place.

    Just an outside perspective.

Leave a Reply to Reasonable Grug Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *